Google is barred from having exclusive contracts for its search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and Gemini app products, but doesn ...

The ruling stems from a 2020 lawsuit filed by the DOJ, which argued Google was maintaining an illegal online search monopoly.

A federal judge ordered steps in the search monopoly case that will restrain Google but not break it up, signaling a cautious ...

Explore how Judge Mehta's antitrust order impacts Google and its AI search rivals, plus analyst insights on GOOGL stock.

Google doesn't have to sell its wildly popular Chrome web browser, but it can't engage in exclusive search deals, US District ...

Alphabet Inc. sheds antitrust worries as AI and ad revenue drive growth. Click here to read an analysis of GOOGL stock now.

Google will not have to sell its Chrome browser in order to address its illegal monopoly in online search, DC District Court ...

The Google judgment also shows how the courts are thinking, confirming that were Apple to go full steam ahead with its own ...

A federal court’s remedies ruling allows Google to retain its Chrome browser and continue paying Apple billions for Safari search placement while recognizing the growing influence of generative AI on ...

Google will have to give up search data to competitors but can keep Chrome and Android, a federal judge ruled in the landmark ...

According to a judge's ruling, Google may keep Chrome and Android but must share search data with competitors.

Judge Amit P. Mehta's opinion emphasizes how the rise of AI search has opened new competitive possibilities and saved Google from the DOJ's most onerous requests.